Reducto Parse vs Tesseract
Tesseract is cheaper per page; Tesseract is faster; only Reducto Parse supports tables, forms, bounding boxes, confidence; only Tesseract supports multilingual.
Reducto Parsereducto/parse | Tesseracttesseract/tesseract | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | OCR API | Open source |
| Price | 20 credits / page | Free |
| Per 1,000 pages | $20.00 | $0.00 |
| Typical speed | 4.0 s / page | 0.6 s / page |
| Best for | High-stakes complex documents | Clean printed text, free |
| Inputs | PDF, images, DOCX | PDF, images |
| Languages | 50+ languages | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | No |
| Handwriting | No | No |
| Math | No | No |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | No |
| Confidence | ✓ Yes | No |
| Forms | ✓ Yes | No |
| Multilingual | No | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Coming soon | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Reducto Parse
High-accuracy parsing for complex financial and legal documents, with citations.
Reducto Parse detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "reducto/parse",
"fallbacks": ["tesseract/tesseract"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}